A decision tree-based damage estimation approach for preliminary seismic assessment of reinforced concrete buildings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.22.1.5Keywords:
Seismic vulnerability assessment, decision trees, reinforced concrete buildings, earthquake risk estimation, seismic risk prioritization.Abstract
This study aims to introduce an earthquake-induced damage classification approach for seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings. Through the use of the damage data collected from post-earthquake inspections after the 2003 Bingöl Earthquake in Turkey, two models were constructed by the decision tree classification technique considering nine building-specific features as the estimation variables in the analysis. The first model was developed for the prediction of the observed damage states of the buildings, whereas the second one concerning the life safety level assessment, was proposed for distinguishing the extremely vulnerable buildings for seismic prioritization. In the validation process, the leave-one-out cross validation technique was adopted to deal with the small sample size of the building inventory. Among the estimation variables, the priority index and the existence of short columns were found to have the highest importance in classification. Results have revealed that the proposed model for life safety level assessment was capable of discriminating the cluster of severely damaged and collapsed buildings from the entire database with an accuracy of 70.59%. Hence, the damage classification approach adopted in this study has the potential for improving effective tools for seismic risk assessment of the existing buildings.
Downloads
References
ATC-20 (1995). Procedures for post-earthquake safety evaluation of buildings. Redwood, CA: Applied Technology Council.
Breiman, L., Friedman, J., Stone, C. J., et al. (1984). Classification and regression trees. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Demartinos, K., & Dritsos, S. (2006). First-level pre-earthquake assessment of buildings using fuzzy logic. Earthquake Spectra, 22(4), 865–885. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2358176
Dönmez, C., & Pujol, S. (2005). Spatial distribution of damage caused by the 1999 earthquakes in Turkey. Earthquake Spectra, 21(1), 53–69. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1850527
Erdik, M., Sesetyan, K., Demircioglu, M., Hancilar, U., Zulfikar, C., Cakti, E., & Cagnan, Z. (2010). Rapid earthquake hazard and loss assessment for Euro- Mediterranean region. Acta Geophysica. 58(1), 855–892. https://doi.org/10.2478/s11600-010-0027-4
FEMA (2012). HAZUS-MH: Multi-hazard loss estimation methodology earthquake model. Technical manual, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Institute of Building Science, Washington, D.C, USA.
Grünthal G. (1998). European Macroseismic Scale EMS-98. Luxembourg: European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology.
Gur, T., Pay, A. C., Ramirez, J. A., Sozen, M. A., Johnson, A. M., Irfanoglu, A., & Bobet, A. (2009). Performance of school buildings in Turkey during the 1999 Düzce and the 2003 Bingöl Earthquakes. Earthquake Spectra, 25(2), 239–256. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3089367
Harirchian, E., & Lahmer, T. (2020). Improved rapid visual earthquake hazard safety evaluation of existing buildings using a type-2 fuzzy logic model. Applied Sciences, 10(7), 2375. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10072375
Harirchian, E., Kumari, V., Jadhav, K., Das, R. R., Rasulzade, S., & Lahmer, T. (2020). A machine learning framework for assessing seismic hazard safety of reinforced concrete buildings. Applied Sciences, 10(20), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.3390/app10207153
Harirchian, E., Lahmer, T., Kumari, V., & Jadhav, K. (2020). Application of Support Vector Machine modeling for the rapid seismic hazard safety evalua-tion of existing buildings. Energies, 13(13), 3340. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13133340
Hassan, A. F., & Sözen, M. A. (1997). Seismic vulnerability assessment of low-rise buildings in regions with infrequent earthquakes, ACI Structural Journal, 94(1), 31–39.
Jain, S. K., Mitra, K., Kumar, M., & Shah, M. (2010). A proposed rapid visual screening procedure for seismic evaluation of RC-frame buildings in India. Earthquake Spectra, 26(3), 709–729. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3456711
Lagomarsino, S., & Giovinazzi, S. (2006). Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability assessment of current buildings, Bulletin of Earth-quake Engineering. 4(4), 415–433. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z
Mangalathu, S., Sun, H., Nweke, C. C., Yi, Z., & Burton, H. V. (2020). Classifying earthquake damage to buildings using machine learning. Earthquake Spectra, 36(1), 183–208. https://doi.org/10.1177/8755293019878137
Matlab. (2019). Release 2019b, Mathworks Inc.
Molina, S., Lang, D. H., & Lindholm, C. D. (2010). SELENA – An open-source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure. Computers & Geosciences, 36, 257–26. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2009.07.006
Ozcebe, G., Ramirez, J., Wasti, T. S., & Yakut, A. (2004). 1 May 2003 Bingol Earthquake engineering report, http://www.seru.metu.edu.tr/archives/databases/Bingol_Database, 2004, Publication No:2004/1. (accessed on 31 January 2018)
Özhendekci, N., & Özhendekci, D. (2012). Rapid seismic vulnerability assessment of low- to mid-rise reinforced concrete buildings using Bingöl’s regional data. Earthquake Spectra, 28(3), 1165–1187. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.4000065
Prasad, A. M., Iversion, L. R., & Liaw, A. (2006). Newer classification and regression tree techniques: bagging and random forest for ecological prediction. Ecosystems, 9, 181–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-005-0054-1
Rapone, D., G. Brando, E. Spacone, & De Matteis ,G. (2018). Seismic vulnerability assessment of historic centers: Description of a predictive method and application to the case study of Scanno (Abruzzi, Italy). International Journal of Architectural Heritage, 12(7–8), 1171–1195. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1503373.
Ródenas, J. L., García-Ayllón, S., & Tomás, A. (2018). Estimation of the buildings seismic vulnerability: A methodological proposal for planning Ante-Earthquake scenarios in urban areas. Applied Sciences, 8(7), 1208. https://doi.org/10.3390/app8071208
Sim, C., Song, C., Skok, N.R., Irfanoglu, A., Pujol, S., & Sozen, M. (2016). Database of low-rise reinforced concrete buildings with earthquake damage. https://datacenterhub.org/deedsdv/publications/view/454 (accessed on 10 November 2018)
Sucuoǧlu, H., Yazgan, U., & Yakut, A. (2007). A screening procedure for seismic risk assessment in urban building stocks. Earthquake Spectra, 23(2), 441–458. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2720931
Şen, Z. (2010). Rapid visual earthquake hazard evaluation of existing buildings by fuzzy logic modeling. Expert Systems with Applications, 37(8), 5653–5660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2010.02.046
Tesfamariam, S., & Saatcioglu, M. (2008). Risk-based seismic evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 24(3), 795–821. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2952767
Tesfamariam, S., & Liu, Z. (2010). Earthquake induced damage classification for reinforced concrete buildings. Structural Safety, 32(2), 154–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2009.10.002
Tesfamariam, S., & Saatcioglu, M. (2010). Seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings using hierarchical fuzzy rule base modeling. Earthquake Spectra, 26(1), 235–256. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.3280115
Tomás, A., Ródenas, J. L., & García-Ayllón, S. (2017). Proposal for new values of behaviour modifiers for seismic vulnerability evaluation of reinforced concrete buildings applied to Lorca (Spain) using damage data from the 2011 Earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 15(9), 3943–3962. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0100-3
Yıldızlar, B., Akcay, C., & Öztorun, N. K. (2018). A rapid analysis method for determining current status of existing buildings: A conceptual framework. Revista de La Construccion, 17(2), 267–278. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.17.2.267
Yücemen, M. S., Özcebe, G., & Pay, A. C. (2004). Prediction of potential damage due to severe earthquakes. Structural Safety, 26(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strusafe.2003.09.002
Downloads
Published
Versions
- 2023-05-03 (4)
- 2023-05-02 (3)
- 2023-05-02 (2)
- 2023-04-30 (1)
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Ayşe Elif Özsoy Özbay
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
