Tool for the integration of building performance information within the BIM process

Authors

  • Francielle Coelho dos Santos Civil Engineering School, Goiás Federal Institute of Science and Technology Education, Jataí (Brazil)
  • Michele Tereza Marques Carvalho Technology College, University of Brasilia, Brasília (Brazil)
  • Maria Carolina Gomes de Oliveira Brandstetter Civil and Environmental Engineering School, Goiânia (Brazil)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.21.3.645

Keywords:

Building Performance, information integration, tool, project phases, BIM.

Abstract

Decision-making regarding building performance in all construction project phases is a complex task. This article addresses the challenge of managing building performance information throughout construction project phases. It proposes a tool that assists in verifying the building performance requirements for different stakeholders and supports the integration of this information within the BIM process. The developed tool allows the launch, monitoring, and creation of a database with information about the project, the work, and the stakeholders. A practical study was chosen to test this tool. Its result is particularly meaningful to all stakeholders, as it prioritizes the information and underlying activities for the collaborative project development among the participants. In summary, the information integration related to the requirements to guarantee the building performance, co-related to the construction project development phases, is essential for improving internal processes. It is worth mentioning that managing this information is not a simple process and requires contextual knowledge, leadership, and management and communication skills.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al Ahbabi, M. S. (2014). Process protocol for the implementation of integrated project delivery in the UAE: a client perspective [Thesis]. University of Salford, Salford, UK.

Almeida, N. M., Sousa, V., Alves Dias, L., & Branco, F. (2010). A framework for combining risk-management and performance-based building approach-es. Building Research and Information, 38(2), 157–174.

Almeida, N. M., Sousa, V., Dias, L. A., & Branco, F. (2015). Engineering risk management in performance-based building environments. Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, 21(2), 218–230. https://doi.org/10.3846/13923730.2013.802740

Alonso, A., Suárez, R., Patricio, J., Escandón, R., & Sendra, J. J. (2021). Acoustic retrofit strategies of windows in facades of residential buildings: Re-quirements and recommendations to reduce exposure to environmental noise. Journal of Building Engineering, 41, 102773.

Arriagada, D. R. E. (2019). Improved building sustainability in seismic zones. Revista de La Construccion, 18(1), 167–177.

Birkhofer, H., & Wäldele, M. (2005). Applied engineering design science - The missing link between design science and design in industry. DS 40: Pro-ceedings of AEDS 2005 Workshop, November, 1–8.

Borges, C. A. de M., & Sabbatini, F. H. (2008). O conceito de desempenho de edificações e a sua importância para o setor da construção civil no Brasil. In Boletim Técnico da Escola Politécnica da USP - Departamento de Engenharia de Construção Civil: Vol. BT/PCC/515.

Cotta, A. C. (2017). Contribuição ao estudo dos impactos da NBR 15575:2013 no processo de gestão de projetos em empresas construtoras de pequeno e médio porte [Dissertação]. Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais.

Croitor, E. P. N. (2008). A gestão de projetos aplicada à reabilitação de edifícios: estudo da interface entre projeto e obra [Dissertação]. In Dissertação (Mestrado em Engenharia). Escola Politécnica da Universidade de São Paulo.

Din, S., Abd-Hamid, Z., & Bryde, D. J. (2011). ISO 9000 certification and construction project performance: The Malaysian experience. International Journal of Project Management, 29(8), 1044–1056.

Dresh, A., Lacerda, D. P., & Antunes Júnior, J. A. V. (2015). DESIGN SCIENCE RESEARCH: método de pesquisa para avanço da ciência e tecnologia (BOOKMAN EDITORA, Ed.; 1a).

Eriksson, P. E., & Westerberg, M. (2011). Effects of cooperative procurement procedures on construction project performance: A conceptual framework. International Journal of Project Management, 29(2), 197–208.

Forman, M. (2018). Experience with the use of commissioning advisers in design: A Danish context. In A. X. Sanchez, K. D. Hampson, & G. London (Eds.), Integrating Information in Built Environments: From Concept to Practice (1st ed., pp. 160–177). Routledge.

Franz, B., & Messner, J. (2019). Evaluating the Impact of BIM on Project Performance. Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 33(3), 1–9.

Göçer, Ö., Hua, Y., & Göçer, K. (2015). Completing the missing link in building design process: Enhancing post-occupancy evaluation method for effec-tive feedback for building performance. Building and Environment, 89, 14–27.

Golzarpoor, B., Haas, C. T., & Rayside, D. (2016). Improving process conformance with Industry Foundation Processes (IFP). Advanced Engineering Informatics, 30(2), 143–156.

Gosling, J., Naim, M., Towill, D., Abouarghoub, W., & Moone, B. (2015). Supplier development initiatives and their impact on the consistency of project performance. Construction Management and Economics, 33(5–6), 390–403.

Gülkan, P., & Sözen, M. A. (2018). Genealogy of performance-based seismic design: Is the present a re-crafted version of the past? In R. Rupakhety & S. Ólafsson (Eds.), Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering (Geotechnic, Vol. 44, pp. 3–29). Springer, Cham.

Hu, S., O’Donnell, J., Corry, E., Turner, W., & Curry, E. (2016). Building performance optimisation: A hybrid architecture for the integration of contextual information and time series data. Automation in Construction, 70, 51–61.

Hwang, B.-G., Tan, H. F., & Sathish, S. (2013). Capital project performance measurement and benchmarking in Singapore. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(2), 143–159.

Kabirifar, K., & Mojtahedi, M. (2019). The impact of engineering, procurement and construction (EPC) phases on project performance: a case of large-scale residential construction project. Buildings, 9(1), 15.

KING, L. W. (2005). The Code of Hammurabi: translated by L. W. King. Yale University.

León, A. G., Pinto, M. S., & Rojas, B. H. (2019). Assessment of the level of stakeholders’ satisfaction with respect to the scope: A methodological pro-posal for mining projects. Revista de La Construccion, 18(1), 186–200.

Li, Y., Han, Y., Luo, M., & Zhang, Y. (2019). Impact of megaproject governance on project performance: dynamic governance of the nanning transporta-tion hub in China. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(3), 05019002.

Liu, J., Wang, Z., Skitmore, M., & Yan, L. (2019). How contractor behavior affects engineering project value-added performance. Journal of Management in Engineering, 35(4), 04019012.

Lu, W., Peng, Y., Shen, Q., & Li, H. (2013). A generic model for measuring benefits of BIM as a learning tool in construction tasks. Journal of Construc-tion Engineering and Management, 139(2), 195–203.

May, P. J. (2001). Societal perspectives about earthquake performance: The fallacy of “acceptable risk.” Earthquake Spectra, 17(4), 725–737. https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1423904

McDonald, R. C., & Persram, S. (2012). The integrative design process. In S. Mallory-Hill, W. F. E. Preiser, & C. Watson (Eds.), Enhancing Building Performance (1st ed., pp. 35–47). Wiley-Blackwell.

Meacham, B. J. (2010). Performance-based building regulatory systems: principles and experiences. In B. J. Meacham (Ed.), Inter-jurisdictionalRegulatory Collaboration Committee …. https://ircc.info/Doc/A1163909.pdf

Meacham, B. J. (2016). Sustainability and resiliency objectives in performance building regulations. Building Research and Information, 44(5–6), 474–489.

Meacham, B. J., & van Straalen, Ij. J. (2018). A socio-technical system framework for risk-informed performance-based building regulation. Building Research and Information, 46(4), 444–462.

MICROSOFT. (2017a). Introduction – C# language specification. https://docs.microsoft.com/pt-br/dotnet/csharp/language-reference/language-specification/introduction

MICROSOFT. (2017b). O SDK do .NET Compiler Platform (APIs do Roslyn). https://docs.microsoft.com/pt-br/dotnet/csharp/roslyn-sdk/

Negendahl, K. (2015). Building performance simulation in the early design stage: An introduction to integrated dynamic models. Automation in Construc-tion, 54, 39–53.

Oliveira, L. A., & Mitidieri Filho, C. V. (2012). O projeto de edifícios habitacionais considerando a norma brasileira de desempenho: análise aplicada para as vedações verticais. Gestão & Tecnologia de Projetos, 7(1), 90–100.

Oppong, G. D., Chan, A. P. C., & Dansoh, A. (2017). A review of stakeholder management performance attributes in construction projects. International Journal of Project Management, 35(6), 1037–1051.

Oti, A. H., Tizani, W., Abanda, F. H., Jaly-Zada, A., & Tah, J. H. M. (2016). Structural sustainability appraisal in BIM. Automation in Construction, 69, 44–58.

Oyegoke, A. (2011). The constructive research approach in project management research. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business, 4(4), 573–595.

Oyelere, S. S., Suhonen, J., Wajiga, G. M., & Sutinen, E. (2017). Design, development, and evaluation of a mobile learning application for computing education. Education and Information Technologies, 23, 467–495.

Reeves, T. J., Olbina, S., & Issa, R. R. A. (2012). Guidelines for using Building Information Modeling (BIM) for environmental analysis of high-performance buildings. International Conference on Computing in Civil Engineering, 277–284.

Rempling, R., Kurul, E., & Oti, A. H. (2019). Research roadmap report information integration in construction. https://site.cibworld.nl/dl/publications/pub417/Publ_417_TG90.pdf

Sanchez, A. X., Hampson, K. D., & London, G. (2018). Integrating information across built environment boundaries. In A. X. Sanchez, K. D. Hampson, & G. London (Eds.), Integrating Information in Built Environments: From Concept to Practice (1st ed., pp. 1–9). Routledge.

Silva, A. T., Kern, A. P., Piccoli, R., & González, M. A. S. (2014). Novas exigências decorrentes de programas de certificação ambiental de prédios e de normas de desempenho na construção. Arquiteturarevista, 10(2), 105–114.

Sinesilassie, E. G., Tabish, S. Z. S., & Jha, K. N. (2017). Critical factors affecting schedule performance: A case of Ethiopian public construction projects - Engineers’ perspective. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 24(5), 757–773.

Szigeti, F., & Davis, G. (2005). Performance based building: conceptual framework. In M. Jasuja (Ed.), PeBBu Final Report.

Tubbs, B. (2001). CIB and performance-based building regulations. CIB World Building Congress, April, 1–6.

Wang, X., & Chong, H. Y. (2015). Setting new trends of integrated Building Information Modelling (BIM) for construction industry. Construction Inno-vation, 15(1), 2–6.

Yan, P., Xie, X., & Meng, Y. (2014). Application of BIM technique in modern project management. Iccrem 2014: Smart Construction and Management in the Context, 302–311.

Zanchetta, C., Borin, P., Cecchini, C., & Xausa, G. (2017). Computational design e sistemi di classificazione per la verifica preditiva delle prestazioni di sistema degli organism edilizi. TECHNE, 0(13), 329–336.

Zheng, W., & Chen, J. (2018). Effect of BIM technology on green buildings. Iccrem 2018, 113–117.

Zhong, B., Gan, C., Luo, H., & Xing, X. (2018). Ontology-based framework for building environmental monitoring and compliance checking under BIM environment. Building and Environment, 141(May), 127–142.

Zhu, J., & Mostafavi, A. (2017). Discovering complexity and emergent properties in project systems: A new approach to understanding project perfor-mance. International Journal of Project Management, 35(1), 1–12.

Downloads

Published

2022-12-29

How to Cite

Santos, F. C. dos, Carvalho, M. T. M. ., & Brandstetter, M. C. G. de O. . (2022). Tool for the integration of building performance information within the BIM process. Revista De La Construcción. Journal of Construction, 21(3), 645–656. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.21.3.645