Effects of low clay content on the anisotropic behavior of sand-clay mixtures: laboratory investigation using TSHCA

Authors

  • Vahid Mohammadi Department of Civil Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia (Iran)
  • Hadi Bahadori Department of Civil Engineering, Urmia University, Urmia (Iran)

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.23.2.317

Keywords:

Plastic Kaolin, anisotropic behavior, torsional shear hollow cylindrical apparatus (TSHCA), firoozkuh sand, ani-sotropy degree.

Abstract

Undrained behavior of sandy soil with fines content is a challenge in geotechnical research. In this article, the effect of low clay content (plastic Kaolin) on the anisotropic behavior of sand is studied. In the technical literature, there are different data about the effect of fine particles (generally high percentage), but there are not enough studies on low fines content (especially plastic fines) and anisotropic conditions. For this purpose, 30 undrained tests are performed using a torsional shear hollow cylindrical apparatus (TSHCA) with constant (αo) and (b) values on Firoozkuh sand. The specimens had Kaolin contents of 0, 3, 5, 7 and 10%, and the inclination angle (αo) is varied from 15o to 60o. The specimens are prepared by dry deposition method and are consolidated under P'c= 100 and 200 kPa. The results of the experiments show that increasing the (αo) leads to more contractive behavior in sand. By adding clay particles to the host sand up to 3%, the peak strength of the specimen is increased (7% and 6% for α=15°and 30°, respectively), and then with the increase of clay content up to 10%, the strength of the specimen is decreased (33% and 22% for α=15°and 30°, respectively). But at α = 60o, with the addition of 5% clay, decrease in the peak strength is observed (about 15%) and with a further increase in the clay content, unlike the angles of 15o and 30o, increase in the peak strength of the specimen is observed, so that at 10% clay, the strength of the specimen is higher than the host sand (about 7%), which can be attributed to the cohesion nature of the clay particles. With the increase of clay content, anisotropy degree is decreased. In other words, with the increase of fines content, the anisotropic behavior is decreased.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Al-Rkaby, A. H., Chegenizadeh, A., & Nikraz, H. (2017). Anisotropic strength of large scale geogrid-reinforced sand: experimental study. Soils and foun-dations, 57(4), 557-574. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40891-017-0111-9

Arthur, J., & Menzies, B. (1972). Inherent anisotropy in a sand. Géotechnique, 22(1), 115-128.

ASTM. (2006a). ASTM. D4253: Standard test methods for maximum index density and unit weight of soils using a vibratory table. In: West Con-shohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.

ASTM. (2006b). ASTM. D4254: Standard test methods for minimum index density and unit weight of soils and calculation ofrelative density. In: West Conshohocken, PA, USA: ASTM International.

Bahadori, H., Ghalandarzadeh, A., & Towhata, I. (2008). Effect of non plastic silt on the anisotropic behavior of sand. Soils and foundations, 48(4), 531-545. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.48.531.

Bensoula, M., Bousmaha, M., & Missoum, H. (2022). Relative density influence on the liquefaction potential of sand with fines. Revista de la construc-ción, 21(3), 693-702. http://dx.doi.org/10.7764/rdlc.21.3.692

Bensoula, M., Missoum, H., & Bendani, K. (2018). Liquefaction potential sand-silt mixtures under static loading. Revista de la Construcción. Journal of Construction, 17(2), 196-208. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.17.2.196

Bishop, A. W. (1971). Shear strength parameters for undisturbed and remolded soil specimens. In Roscoe Memorial Symposium, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 3-58.

Bouferra, R., & Shahrour, I. (2004). Influence of fines on the resistance to liquefaction of a clayey sand. Proceedings of the Institution of civil engineers-ground improvement, 8(1), 1-5. https://doi.org/10.1680/grim.2004.8.1.1

Cai, Y., Yu, H.-S., Wanatowski, D., & Li, X. (2013). Noncoaxial behavior of sand under various stress paths. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmen-tal Engineering, 139(8), 1381-1395. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.00008

Casagrande, A. (1944). Shear failure of anisotropic materials. Proc. Boston Soc. Civ. Engrs, 31, 74-87.

Cherif Taiba, A., Mahmoudi, Y., Belkhatir, M., Kadri, A., & Schanz, T. (2018). Experimental characterization of the undrained instability and steady state of silty sand soils under monotonic loading conditions. International Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 12(5), 513-529. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386362.2017.1302643

Chu, J., & Leong, W. (2002). Effect of fines on instability behaviour of loose sand. Géotechnique, 52(10), 751-755. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.2002.52.10.751

Georgiannou, V., Burland, J., & Hight, D. (1990). The undrained behaviour of clayey sands in triaxial compression and extension. Géotechnique, 40(3), 431-449. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1990.40.3.431

Ghahremani, M., & Ghalandarzadeh, A. (2006). Effect of plastic fines on cyclic resistance of sands. In Soil and rock behavior and modeling, 406-412. https://doi.org/10.1061/40862(194)54

Guo, C., & Cui, Y. (2020). Pore structure characteristics of debris flow source material in the Wenchuan earthquake area. Engineering Geology, 267, 105499. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105499

Guo, P. J., & Stolle, D. F. (2005). On the failure of granular materials with fabric effects. Soils and foundations, 45(4), 1-12. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.45.4_1

Ishihara, K. (1993). Liquefaction and flow failure during earthquakes. Géotechnique, 43(3), 351-451.

Ishihara, K., & Towhata, I. (1983). Sand response to cyclic rotation of principal stress directions as induced by wave loads. Soils and foundations, 23(4), 11-26. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.23.4_11

Keramatikerman, M., Chegenizadeh, A., Nikraz, H., & Sabbar, A. S. (2018). Effect of flyash on liquefaction behaviour of sand-bentonite mixture. Soils and foundations, 58(5), 1288-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sandf.2018.07.004

Khayat, N., Ghalandarzadeh, A., & Jafari, M. K. (2014). Grain shape effect on the anisotropic behaviour of silt–sand mixtures. Proceedings of the Institu-tion of Civil Engineers-Geotechnical Engineering, 167(3), 281-296. https://doi.org/ 10.1680/geng.11.00093

Koester, J. P. (1994). The influence of fines type and content on cyclic strength. In Ground failures under seismic conditions, ASCE, 17-33.

Krim, A., Arab, A., Chemam, M., Brahim, A., Sadek, M., & Shahrour, I. (2019). Experimental study on the liquefaction resistance of sand–clay mixtures: Effect of clay content and grading characteristics. Marine Georesources & Geotechnology, 37(2), 129-141. https://doi.org/10.1080/1064119X.2017.1407974

Kumruzzaman, M., & Yin, J.-H. (2010). Influences of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on the stress–strain–strength behaviour of completely decomposed granite. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 47(2), 164-179. https://doi.org/10.1139/T09-079

Lade, P. V., Nam, J., & Hong, W. P. (2008). Shear banding and cross-anisotropic behavior observed in laboratory sand tests with stress rotation. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 45(1), 74-84. https://doi.org/10.1139/T07-078

Li, X., & Yu, H.-S. (2009). Influence of loading direction on the behavior of anisotropic granular materials. International Journal of Engineering Science, 47(11-12), 1284-1296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijengsci.2009.03.001

Liu, X., Zhang, X., Kong, L., Yin, S., & Xu, Y. (2022). Shear strength anisotropy of natural granite residual soil. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenviron-mental Engineering, 148(1), 04021168. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002709

Mohammadi, V., & Bahadori, H. (2024). Influence of Low Silt Content on the Anisotropic Behaviour of Sand. International Journal of Civil Engineering. 22, 1507–1522. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40999-024-00964-3

Nishimura, S., Jardine, R., & Minh, N. (2011). Shear strength anisotropy of natural London clay. In Stiff Sedimentary Clays: Genesis and Engineering Behaviour: Géotechnique Symposium in Print, Thomas Telford Ltd, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1680/ssc.41080.0009

Oda, M. (1972). Initial fabrics and their relations to mechanical properties of granular material. Soils and foundations, 12(1), 17-36.

Ohsaki, Y. (1970). Effects of sand compaction on liquefaction during the Tokachioki earthquake. Soils and foundations, 10(2), 112-128.

Peng, D., Xu, Q., Liu, F., He, Y., Zhang, S., Qi, X., Zhao, K., & Zhang, X. (2018). Distribution and failure modes of the landslides in Heitai terrace, China. Engineering Geology, 236, 97-110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enggeo.2017.09.016

Prasanna, R., Sinthujan, N., & Sivathayalan, S. (2020). Effects of initial direction and subsequent rotation of principal stresses on liquefaction potential of loose sand. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 146(3), 04019130. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0002182

Radjai, F., & Azéma, E. (2009). Shear strength of granular materials. European journal of environmental and civil engineering, 13(2), 203-218. https://doi.org/10.1080/ 19648189.2009.9693100

Saada, A. (1988). Hollow cylinder torsional devices: Their advantage and limitations, advanced triaxial testing of soil and rock. ASTM STP, 977, 766-789.

Seyedi Hosseininia, E. (2012). Investigating the micromechanical evolutions within inherently anisotropic granular materials using discrete element meth-od. Granular Matter, 14(4), 483-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10035-012-0340-5

Shibuya, S., & Hight, D. (1987). A bounding surface for granular materials. Soils and foundations, 27(4), 123-136.

Symes, M. J. P. R. (1983). Rotation of principal stresses in sand. Ph.D. thesis, College of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of London.

Talamkhani, S., & Naeini, S. A. (2021). The undrained shear behavior of reinforced clayey sand. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 39, 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01490-4

Tokimatsu, K., & Yoshimi, Y. (1983). Empirical correlation of soil liquefaction based on SPT N-value and fines content. Soils and foundations, 23(4), 56-74.

Triantafyllos, P. K. (2020). Experimental study of the anisotropic flow deformation and critical state of sand. PhD thesis, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.

Tsuchida, H. (1970). Prediction and countermeasure against the liquefaction in sand deposits. In Proceedings of the seminar of the Port and Harbour Research Institute, 3, 3.1-3.33.

Uthayakumar, M., & Vaid, Y. (1998). Static liquefaction of sands under multiaxial loading. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 35(2), 273-283.

Wrzesiński, G., & Lechowicz, Z. (2015). Testing of undrained shear strength in a hollow cylinder apparatus. Studia Geotechnica et Mechanica, 37(2), 69-73.

Xiong, H., Guo, L., Cai, Y., & Yang, Z. (2016). Experimental study of drained anisotropy of granular soils involving rotation of principal stress direction. European journal of environmental and civil engineering, 20(4), 431-454. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1039662

Yang, L.-T., Li, X., Yu, H.-S., & Wanatowski, D. (2016). A laboratory study of anisotropic geomaterials incorporating recent micromechanical understand-ing. Acta Geotechnica, 11, 1111-1129. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-015-0423-7

Yoshimine, M., & Ishihara, K. (1998). Flow potential of sand during liquefaction. Soils and foundations, 38(3), 189-198.

Yoshimine, M., Ishihara, K., & Vargas, W. (1998). Effects of principal stress direction and intermediate principal stress on undrained shear behavior of sand. Soils and foundations, 38(3), 179-188.

Zeng, Y., Shi, X., Chen, W., & Feng, W. (2023). Equivalent Compression Curve for Clay–Sand Mixtures Using Equivalent Void-Ratio Concept. Interna-tional journal of geomechanics, 23(2), 06022039. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0002643

Downloads

Published

2024-08-30

How to Cite

Mohammadi, V., & Bahadori, H. (2024). Effects of low clay content on the anisotropic behavior of sand-clay mixtures: laboratory investigation using TSHCA. Revista De La Construcción. Journal of Construction, 23(2), 317–334. https://doi.org/10.7764/RDLC.23.2.317