Urban planning in Chile today: "Structured social actors" and the construction of governance networks
Keywords:
Urban geography, governace networks, urban governabilityAbstract
This article examines the institutionalization in Chile of new governance arrangements based on increasing interaction among public and private actors. This process, gradual and geographically differentiated, is interpreted as a product of social actors operating within a given social context and constructing complex governance networks based on specific power relations. The theoretical framework exposed here points to consider the reciprocal relation between technical knowledge and politics, and suggests new avenues for applied geographic research.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
References
DE MATTOS, C. A. (1996): “Avances de la globalización y nueva dinámica metropolitana: Santiago de Chile, 1975-1995”. Eure XXII: 39-60.
DE MATTOS, C. A. (1999): “Santiago de Chile, globalización y expansión metropolitana: lo que existía sigue existiendo”. Eure XXV: 29-56.
DI GAETANO, A. (1997): “Urban governing alignments and realignments in comparative perspective: devel78
HUGO MARCELO ZUNINO E. opmental politics in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, England”. Urban Affairs 32: 844-871.
DONNER, C. y C. PARRA. (1999): “Concertación Público- Privada. Corporaciones para el Desarrollo Local. Casos de Santiago y Huechuraba”. Tesis (Magister), Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Instituto de Sociología.
EVANS, P. (1997): “Development strategies across the public-private divide; government action, social capital, and development: reviewing the evidence of synergy”, en State-society synergy: government and social capital in development. Editado por P. Evans. Berkeley: University of California.
GIBBS, D. y A. E. JONAS. (2000): “Governance and regulation in local environmental policy : the utility of regime approach”. Geoforum 31: 299-313.
GOODWIN, M. y J. PAINTER. (1996): “Concrete research, urban regimes, and regulation theory”, en Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a global economy. Editado por M. Lauria, pp. 13-29. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
GUTIÉRREZ, C. (1997): “Una Huechuraba rica”, en La Tercera 15 de Junio. Santiago.
HARVEY, D. (1982): The limits to capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
HARVEY, D. (1985): The urban experience. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
HARVEY, D. (1989): The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, England ; New York, NY: Blackwell.
HIDALGO, R. (2000): “La década de 1950 en Chile. Un período clave en la definición de las políticas de vivienda y la planificación contemporánea”. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande 27: 173-180.
ILUSTRE MUNICIPALIDAD DE SANTIAGO (1999): Memoria gestión municipal 1999. Santiago: Ilustre Municipalidad de Santiago.
ILUSTRE MUNICIPALIDAD DE SANTIAGO (2000): Gestión de 10 años. Santiago: Ilustre Municipalidad de Santiago.
JESSOP, B. (1996): “A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes”, en Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a
global economy. Editado por M. Lauria, pp. 51-74. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
JONES, M. (1998): “Restructuring the local state: economic governance or social regulation?” Political Geography 17: 959-988.
MACLEOD, G. y M. GOODWIN. (1999a): “Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: on the state, politics, scale, and explanation”. Political Geography 18: 697-730.
MACLEOD, G. y M. GOODWIN. (1999b): “Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance”. Progress in Human Geography 23: 503-527.
MACLEOD, G. y A. E. JONAS. (1999): “Re-regulating a regional rusbelt: institutional fixes, entrepreneurial discourse, and the ‘politics of representation’”. Environment and Planning D 17: 575-605.
MCGUIRK, P. (2000): “Power and policy networks in urban governance: local government and propertyled regeneration in Dublin”. Urban Studies 37: 651- 672.
MILLIBAND, R. (1969): The state in capitalist society. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
PROCENTRO. (1999): Procentro. Santiago.
REPÚBLICA DE CHILE (1985): Decreto Supremo de Justicia 1.182. Estatutos de la Corporación para el Desarrollo de Santiago. Santiago
ROBERTS, S. M. y R. H. SCHEIN (1993): “The entrepreneurial city: fabricating urban development in Syracuse, New York”. Professional Geographer 45: 21-33.
ROMERO, H. y X. TOLEDO. (1998): “Crecimiento económico, regionalización y comportamiento espacial del sector inmobiliario en Chile”. Revista Geográfica
de Chile Terra Australis 43: 131-203.
RYDIN, Y. (1998): The enabling local state and urban development: resources, rhetoric and planning in East London. Urban Studies 35: 175-191.
SABATINI, F. y F. SOLER. (1995): “Paradoja de la planificación urbana en Chile”. Eure XXI: 61-73.
SHORT, J. R.; L. M. BENTON, W. B. LUCE y J. WALTON. (1993): “Reconstructing the image of an industrial city”. Annals of the Association of American
geographers 83: 207-224.
SILVA, E. (1996): The state and capital in Chile: business elites, technocrats, and market economics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
SILVA, P. (1998): “Neoliberalism, democratization, and the rise of technocrats, en The changing role of the state in Latin America”. Editado por M. Vellinga, pp. 75-92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
STONE, C. N. (1989): Regime politics : governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Studies in government and public policy. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
SWYNGEDOUW, E. (1997): “Excluding the others: the production of scale and scaled politics”, en Geographies of economies. Editado por R. Lee y J. Wills,
pp. 167-176. London: Arnold.
TAYLOR, L. (1998): “Citizenship, participation and democracy. Changing dynamics in Chile and Argentina.” London: Macmillan.
ZUNINO, H. M. (2000): “Globalización y construcción social del territorio. Reflexiones sobre la gobernabilidad y la planificación de las ciudades”. Revista Geografía Norte Grande 27: 133-137.
DE MATTOS, C. A. (1999): “Santiago de Chile, globalización y expansión metropolitana: lo que existía sigue existiendo”. Eure XXV: 29-56.
DI GAETANO, A. (1997): “Urban governing alignments and realignments in comparative perspective: devel78
HUGO MARCELO ZUNINO E. opmental politics in Boston, Massachusetts, and Bristol, England”. Urban Affairs 32: 844-871.
DONNER, C. y C. PARRA. (1999): “Concertación Público- Privada. Corporaciones para el Desarrollo Local. Casos de Santiago y Huechuraba”. Tesis (Magister), Santiago: Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Instituto de Sociología.
EVANS, P. (1997): “Development strategies across the public-private divide; government action, social capital, and development: reviewing the evidence of synergy”, en State-society synergy: government and social capital in development. Editado por P. Evans. Berkeley: University of California.
GIBBS, D. y A. E. JONAS. (2000): “Governance and regulation in local environmental policy : the utility of regime approach”. Geoforum 31: 299-313.
GOODWIN, M. y J. PAINTER. (1996): “Concrete research, urban regimes, and regulation theory”, en Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a global economy. Editado por M. Lauria, pp. 13-29. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
GUTIÉRREZ, C. (1997): “Una Huechuraba rica”, en La Tercera 15 de Junio. Santiago.
HARVEY, D. (1982): The limits to capital. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
HARVEY, D. (1985): The urban experience. Baltimore: The John Hopkins University Press.
HARVEY, D. (1989): The condition of postmodernity: an enquiry into the origins of cultural change. Oxford, England ; New York, NY: Blackwell.
HIDALGO, R. (2000): “La década de 1950 en Chile. Un período clave en la definición de las políticas de vivienda y la planificación contemporánea”. Revista de Geografía Norte Grande 27: 173-180.
ILUSTRE MUNICIPALIDAD DE SANTIAGO (1999): Memoria gestión municipal 1999. Santiago: Ilustre Municipalidad de Santiago.
ILUSTRE MUNICIPALIDAD DE SANTIAGO (2000): Gestión de 10 años. Santiago: Ilustre Municipalidad de Santiago.
JESSOP, B. (1996): “A neo-Gramscian approach to the regulation of urban regimes”, en Reconstructing urban regime theory: regulating urban politics in a
global economy. Editado por M. Lauria, pp. 51-74. Thousand Oaks, Ca.: Sage.
JONES, M. (1998): “Restructuring the local state: economic governance or social regulation?” Political Geography 17: 959-988.
MACLEOD, G. y M. GOODWIN. (1999a): “Reconstructing an urban and regional political economy: on the state, politics, scale, and explanation”. Political Geography 18: 697-730.
MACLEOD, G. y M. GOODWIN. (1999b): “Space, scale and state strategy: rethinking urban and regional governance”. Progress in Human Geography 23: 503-527.
MACLEOD, G. y A. E. JONAS. (1999): “Re-regulating a regional rusbelt: institutional fixes, entrepreneurial discourse, and the ‘politics of representation’”. Environment and Planning D 17: 575-605.
MCGUIRK, P. (2000): “Power and policy networks in urban governance: local government and propertyled regeneration in Dublin”. Urban Studies 37: 651- 672.
MILLIBAND, R. (1969): The state in capitalist society. London: Weidenfield and Nicolson.
PROCENTRO. (1999): Procentro. Santiago.
REPÚBLICA DE CHILE (1985): Decreto Supremo de Justicia 1.182. Estatutos de la Corporación para el Desarrollo de Santiago. Santiago
ROBERTS, S. M. y R. H. SCHEIN (1993): “The entrepreneurial city: fabricating urban development in Syracuse, New York”. Professional Geographer 45: 21-33.
ROMERO, H. y X. TOLEDO. (1998): “Crecimiento económico, regionalización y comportamiento espacial del sector inmobiliario en Chile”. Revista Geográfica
de Chile Terra Australis 43: 131-203.
RYDIN, Y. (1998): The enabling local state and urban development: resources, rhetoric and planning in East London. Urban Studies 35: 175-191.
SABATINI, F. y F. SOLER. (1995): “Paradoja de la planificación urbana en Chile”. Eure XXI: 61-73.
SHORT, J. R.; L. M. BENTON, W. B. LUCE y J. WALTON. (1993): “Reconstructing the image of an industrial city”. Annals of the Association of American
geographers 83: 207-224.
SILVA, E. (1996): The state and capital in Chile: business elites, technocrats, and market economics. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
SILVA, P. (1998): “Neoliberalism, democratization, and the rise of technocrats, en The changing role of the state in Latin America”. Editado por M. Vellinga, pp. 75-92. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
STONE, C. N. (1989): Regime politics : governing Atlanta, 1946-1988. Studies in government and public policy. Lawrence, Kansas: University Press of Kansas.
SWYNGEDOUW, E. (1997): “Excluding the others: the production of scale and scaled politics”, en Geographies of economies. Editado por R. Lee y J. Wills,
pp. 167-176. London: Arnold.
TAYLOR, L. (1998): “Citizenship, participation and democracy. Changing dynamics in Chile and Argentina.” London: Macmillan.
ZUNINO, H. M. (2000): “Globalización y construcción social del territorio. Reflexiones sobre la gobernabilidad y la planificación de las ciudades”. Revista Geografía Norte Grande 27: 133-137.
Downloads
Published
2001-01-01
How to Cite
ZUNINO E, H. M. (2001). Urban planning in Chile today: "Structured social actors" and the construction of governance networks. Revista De Geografía Norte Grande, (28), 73–78. Retrieved from https://revistanortegrande.uc.cl/index.php/RGNG/article/view/46577
Issue
Section
Artículos
